Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Twitty v. Robinson et al
as 0:2010cv02661
Plaintiff:
Irving E Twitty
Defendant:
Elaine Robinson, Tijuana L Crisp, Hunter W Elgin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Ozmint et al
as 0:2010cv01089
Plaintiff:
Willie A Witherspoon
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Willie Eagleton , Doris Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. McMasters et al
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Curtis Q Owens
Defendant:
Henery McMasters , Jon Ozmint , Oscar Faulkenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rettew et al v. South Carolina Department of Parks, The
as 9:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Richard E Rettew, Richard E Rettew, Madeline C Ashley and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Parks, The and South Carolina Department of Parks, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Maddox v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv02227
Plaintiff:
Barbara Maddox
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Owens v. McMasters et al
as 0:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Curtis Q Owens
Defendant:
Henery McMasters, Jon Ozmint, Oscar Faulkenberry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grimes v. Ford et al
as 0:2008cv02773
Plaintiff:
William Grimes
Defendant:
Frits Ford, Willie Eagleton, Robin Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Nickerson v. Doe et al
as 4:2008cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Lee Nickerson
Defendant:
John Doe and Kelli G Maddox
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Maddox et al
as 6:2007cv03986
Plaintiff:
Paul Abdul Williams
Defendant:
Judge Maddox, Derrick Bulsa and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Maddox v. Astrue
as 8:2007cv03696
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Maddox
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
