Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B-3-88-A, et al. v. Sileoni 98822
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
William B-3-88-A, Linzy, Thompson and others
Defendant:
Sileoni 98822
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
IDOC, Jay Christensen, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Director Atencio, Director Tewalt, Deputy Director Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. The Entity (IDOC), et al.
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
The Entity (IDOC), Jay Christensen, Timothy R. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Christenson et al
as 1:2018cv00409
Defendant:
Wally Campbell, Tianna Borgi, Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Maddox et al v. City of Sandpoint et al
as 2:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Dana Maddox , D. M. , Raymond Foster and others
Defendant:
City of Sandpoint , City of Sandpoint Police Department , Skylar Carl Ziegler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00276
Plaintiff:
Richard D Maddox
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
