Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wu v. SSA (Social Security Administration)
as 1:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Maggie Wu
Defendant:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Maggi v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Maggi
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mehta v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Rukminesh Mehta
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Maggie J. Kuhl, The Kuhl Law Office, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv00130
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Maggie R. Williams
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wu v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00527
Plaintiff:
Maggie Wu
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Butler et al v. Equity Lending, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01048
Plaintiff:
Effie L. Butler and Maggie Butler
Defendant:
Equity Lending, Inc., IRA Services Trust Company, Richard E. Grodsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Li v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00857
Plaintiff:
Maggie Li
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. , Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Audi AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roland v. Maggie L. Walker Governor's School Regional School Board et al
as 3:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Grady E. Roland
Defendant:
Maggie L. Walker Governor's School Regional School Board , James F. Lane, Ed.D. and Jeff McGee, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01306
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
