Cases 31 - 40 of 255
Vereker v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09319
Plaintiff:
Lori Vereker
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., David L. Mahoney, Neil F. McFarlane and others
Cook v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06102
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cook
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., David L. Mahoney, Neil F. McFarlane and others
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08856
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., David L. Mahoney, Neil F. McFarlane and others
Justice v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08818
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals Inc., David L. Mahoney, Neil F. McFarlane and others
Wang v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08742
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., David L. Mahoney, Neil F. McFarlane and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Remauro et al v. de Blasio
as 1:2021cv04553
Plaintiff:
Leticia Remauro, Jane Frangos, William Pepitone and others
Defendant:
Bill de Blasio and New York City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahoney v. Bennett et al
as 1:2021cv04513
Plaintiff:
Brian Mahoney
Defendant:
Marlon Bennett, Regional Express LLC and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2021cv06247
Plaintiff:
Jill Accardi, Alice V. Alexander, Theresa Allegretta and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Mahoney v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.
as 2:2021cv04127
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mahoney
Defendant:
Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
