Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ronald Rollings v. Federal Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution, Mailroom Staff, GED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Connor v. CDC Mailroom Staff
as 2:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
Thyrone Connor
Defendant:
CDC Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Richer et al
as 2:2021cv00714
Defendant:
AD - Seg. Staff, Legal Mailroom Staff, Trust Office Staff and others
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Kyle v. Covello et al
as 2:2020cv02148
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Mailroom Staff and Lakesha Thompson
Plaintiff:
Donta Ladeal Kyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. CSP-Corcoran Mailroom Staff, et al.
as 1:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lonnell Roberson
Defendant:
CSP-Corcoran Mailroom Staff and Zavala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Ryan Eha v. Trust Account Office Staff et al
as 5:2015cv02553
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Eha
Defendant:
Mailroom Staff, Prison Law Library Legal Mail System Staff, Staff and others
Linthecome v. Alfaro et al
as 1:2014cv01438
Plaintiff:
Marcus Leon Linthecome
Defendant:
Sandra Alfaro, NKSP Mailroom Staff, NKSP Appeals Coordinators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Medina et al
as 3:2013cv05773
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nichols
Defendant:
Eloy Medina, L. Gomez, M. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. CSP Solano Mailroom Staff, et al.
as 2:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Williamson
Defendant:
CSP Solano Mailroom Staff, Postmaster of the U.S. Postal Service and Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaTanya Cramer v. Nunez et al
as 2:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
LaTanya Cramer
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mailroom, Mailroom Staff, Captain Nunez and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
