Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Malik Laws v. Glendale, City off, et al
as 23-15443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENDALE, CITY OFF and GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Malik Laws v. ADOC, et al
as 23-15423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ARIZONA, STATE OF
Malik Laws v. Maricopa County Superior Court, et al
as 23-15424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, PHOENIX, CITY OF and MARICOPA, COUNTY OF
Laws v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Malik Jaleel Laws
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laws v. Glendale, City of et al
as 2:2022cv02002
Plaintiff:
Malik Jaleel Laws
Defendant:
Glendale, City of and Glendale Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laws v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2022cv01979
Plaintiff:
Malik Jaleel Laws
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court, Phoenix, City of and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik Laws v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 22-16692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA, STATE OF, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DAVID SHINN, Director, also named as David Schinn
Malik Laws v. Glendale, City of
as 22-16686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENDALE, CITY OF
Laws v. Glendale, City of
as 2:2022cv01708
Plaintiff:
Malik Jaleel Laws
Defendant:
Glendale, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laws v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01707
Plaintiff:
Malik Jaleel Laws
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
