Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bossio-Haines v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Malissa Bossio-Haines
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hines et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
Keita Hines , Jody Evans , Jennifer Byron and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01395
Plaintiff:
Keita Hines , Jody Evans , Jennifer Byron and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp., Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burkhart v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Malissa A. Burkhart
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brooks et al v. The Estate of Clyde E. Lawrence, et al
as 4:2013cv00574
Plaintiff:
Malissa Brooks and Bradley Brooks
Defendant:
The Midwestern Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
The Midwestern Indemnity Company v. Brooks et al
as 4:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
The Midwestern Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Malissa Brooks and Bradley Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Brooks v. Lawrence et al
as 4:2012cv00987
Plaintiff:
Malissa Brooks
Defendant:
Clyde E Lawrence and America First Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore
as 4:2009cv01645
Plaintiff:
Malissa Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. Dorris et al
as 1:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
Malissa Dorris, Todd Vandergriff, Unknown Reece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
