Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Adams v. Human Resources
as 23-40048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Human Resources, Coffield Unit, Office of Inspector General, ID 12599 Unit Grievance Investigator and others
Adams v. Human Resources et al
as 6:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Human Resources, Office of Inspector General, ID I2599 Unit Grievance Investigator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott v. UTMB
as 21-40856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant / Appellee:
UTMB Galveston Texas, Warden Michael Butcher, D.D.S. Andres Gilman and others
Christopher Garrett v. Kimberly Sulser, et al
as 20-40173
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR UNKNOWN, AMBER TEDDER, MARY CLOPE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GARRETT
Prince McCoy, Sr. v. Gary Wright, et al
as 20-40128
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE LASTRAPES, LICENSED VOCATIONAL NURSE TONYA DAMM, GARY WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRINCE MCCOY, SR.
Sanders v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00528
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Med Pract Manager Pam Pace, K. Putnam and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy, Sr. v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Lt. Michael L Odom, MHC Lyndsey Howell, Sgt. FNU McAndrews and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Davis et al
as 9:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Med Pract Manager Pam Pace, K. Putnam and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Pace et al
as 6:2019cv00498
Defendant:
Rosemary Ofili, Med Pract Manager Pam Pace, J Crump and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
