Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Medel v. USA
as 1:2011cv00135
Petitioner:
Manuel Alonso Medel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Medel
as 11-4135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL ALONSO MEDEL
Medel v. Utah, State of et al
as 1:2010cv00206
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alonso Medel
Defendant:
Utah, State of and Dale A. Kimball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. Port-O-Tech, Corp. et al
as 0:2009cv61266
Plaintiff:
Wilford Morgan and Robert James
Defendant:
Port-O-Tech, Corp., William Peeler and Manuel Alonso
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Haynes v. UNI Taxi Service et al
as 2:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
Peggy Haynes
Defendant:
UNI Taxi Service and Manuel Alonso
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez et al v. Professional Plumbing Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv20919
Plaintiff:
Nelson Rodriguez, Francisco Otero-Hernandez, Jose Gorrin and others
Defendant:
Professional Plumbing Corp., Manuel Alonso, Manuel R. Alonso and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia-Campos v. Hudson et al
as 4:2008cv00159
Petitioner:
Manuel Alonso Garcia-Campos
Respondent:
Sharon Hudson, Marcy Forman and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Garcia-Campos v. Hudson et al
as 4:2008cv00143
Petitioner:
Manuel Alonso Garcia-Campos
Respondent:
Sharon Hudson, Marcy Forman, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bozeman et al v. Port-O-Tech, Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv60569
Plaintiff:
Chester Bozeman, Chester Bozeman, Chester Bozeman and others
Defendant:
Port-O-Tech, Corp., William Peeler and Manuel Alonso
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
