Cases 1 - 10 of 17
USA v. Rocha
as 23-50136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marco Antonio Rocha, also known as Marco Rocha
Rocha v. Fremont County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00109
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Rocha, Jr.
Defendant:
Fremont County Detention Center and Jailer Wigham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocha v. People of The Colorado Republic, The
as 1:2020cv03705
Respondent:
People of the Colorado Republic, The
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Rocha, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Rocha v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv03606
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Rocha, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson County Detention Center, Wihelm Q., A. A. Lawal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DE SOUZA LIMA et al v. LINEA AEREA MERIDA INTERNACIONAL DE AVIACION et al
as 1:2020cv23631
Plaintiff:
FLORA TARQUI AVILA, DAIELLI FAUSTINO KEMITC DA SILVA, DICLEIA JOHANN DE JESUS and others
Defendant:
RICARDO ALBERTO ALBACETE VIDAL, BISA SEGUROS Y REASEGUROS, S.A., John Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rocha v. Cannon et al
as 1:2012cv01106
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Rocha
Defendant:
Hosea Cannon and Garry Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocha v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO A. ROCHA
Defendant - Appellee:
A. ZAVARAS, CDOC Director, GEORGE DUNBAR, BVCC Director, RHONA MEDFORD, BVCC Hearing Officer and others
Marcos Villafuerte Rocha v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72608
Petitioner:
MARCOS VILLAFUERTE ROCHA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rocha v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Rocha
Defendant:
A. (I) Zavaras, A. Zavaras, George (I) W. Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocha v. Twilleger, et al
as 11-1275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO A. ROCHA
Defendant - Appellee:
S. TWILLEGER, in an individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
