Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Marcos Ortiz v. Tutler, et al
as 11-20321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TUTLER, Correctional Officer, A. HOUSTON, Correctional Officer, J JONES, Warden and others
Marcos Ortiz, Jr. v. John Marshall
as 11-55643
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Marcos Ortiz v. Douglas Dretke, et al
as 11-10336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS DRETKE, R TREON, Warden, J MOONEYHAM and others
Marcos Ortiz v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, et al
as 11-10335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ, also known as Marcos Lopez Ortiz
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, M SIZEMORE and NORTHWEST TEXAS HOSPITAL
Marcos Ortiz v. R. Treon, et al
as 11-10313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
R TREON, Warden, JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, J MOONEYHAM and others
Ortiz v. Thaler
as 3:2011cv00129
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcos Ortiz v. J. Henry, et al
as 11-40299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
J. HENRY, Unit Classification Committee Member, L WILLIAMS, Assistant Warden and G. LUMPKINS, Warden
Ortiz v. Henry et al
as 4:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
J. Henry, L. Williams and G. Lumpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Henry et al
as 3:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
J. Henry, L. Williams and G. Lumpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2010cv00452
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
