Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Davis v. MDOC Offender Service Dept. et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
MDOC Offender Service Dept., Mrs Garner, Shamia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. MacDonald et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
Tracy MacDonald, Sequcia Wren, Marcus McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. McClure
as 4:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Emerson Osborne
Respondent:
Marcus McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruse v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Cruse, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, Burl Cain, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jamar Allen
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Marcus McClure and Darowski Mallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Mississippi State Penitentiary et al
as 4:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
Tracy MacDonald, Sequcia Wren, Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoye v. McClure et al
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hoye
Defendant:
Marcus McClure, Tracey McDonald, Lee Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. McClure et al
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Cadarrio Patrick
Defendant:
Marcus McClure, Timothy Morris, Tracy McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. McClure
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Paul Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent Marcus McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoye v. McClure
as 22-60480
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alonzo Hoye
Respondent / Appellee:
Marcus McClure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
