Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Hendrix v. Martuscello
as 24-1129
Plaintiff:
TROY HENDRIX
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, JOHN OR JANE DOES 6-10, members of the DOCCS SHMC as Marcy Correctional Facility, JAMES O'GORMAN, Deputy Commissioner for Correctional Facilities and others
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aberman et al v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 5:2024cv02923
Plaintiff:
Marcie Aberman, Charles Dvorak, Megan Ohlrich and others
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Gnrale des tablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
James v. D'Amore
as 24-474
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Respondent:
MICHAEL D'AMORE, Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
Demarest v. Town of Underhill
as 24-147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID P. DEMAREST
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF UNDERHILL, a municipality and charter town, DANIEL STEINABAUER, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, BOB STONE, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Thompson et al v. Masterson et al
as 5:2023cv04120
Plaintiff:
Mike Thompson and Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Ty Masterson and Daniel Hawkins
Intervenor:
Ethan Corson, Dinah Sykes, Marci Francisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leggett v. Ontada
as 23-7831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY L. LEGGETT
Defendant / Appellee:
LESTER WRIGHT and Ms. BUCANNAN
Defendant:
BUCANUAN ONTADA, PORTCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARCY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
