Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Mpoy v. The State of Maryland et al
as 8:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Bruno K. Mpoy
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, Montgomery County, Maryland, Marcy Waxman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Koteen v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 1:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
MARCIE KOTEEN
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Lancaster v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Marcy Renee Lancaster
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tilkin v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2020cv03232
Plaintiff:
Marcie Tilkin
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. Braverman et al
as 1:2020cv01877
Plaintiff:
M.R., Marcie Cook, Micha Pinkney and others
Defendant:
Housing Authority of Baltimore City, Department of Housing & Community Development and Michael Braverman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lancaster v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03043
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Plaintiff:
Marcy Renee Lancaster
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gaske et al v. River Run Development Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03817
Defendant:
The Players Club, LLC, River Run Development Associates, LLC and Lewis S Meltzer
Plaintiff:
Deborah Gaske, Tara Scarlavia, Jean Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Krell v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Edwin Charles Krell
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Maryland , Lamonte Cooke , Gary Hofmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
Marcie Hunt
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
