Cases 1 - 8 of 8
O'CALLAGHAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12349
Plaintiff:
MARGARET O'CALLAGHAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
O'BRIEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv08094
Plaintiff:
MARGARET O'BRIEN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00799
Plaintiff:
JOYCE WILLIAMS , Bertha Alexander , Marsha Kay Anderson and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SILKWOOD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2011cv61232
Plaintiff:
PERRY FLOYD SILKWOOD and MARGARET O SILKWOOD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HATAB et al
as 2:2009cv03030
Plaintiff:
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MARGARET O. HATAB and SARA CAROTHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. ALLEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv01043
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
ALLEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, JOHN A. FRY, JAMES GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FLYNN et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC. et al
as 2:2007cv60081
Plaintiff:
FLOYD EUGENE FLYNN, SR. and MARGARET O. FLYNN
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC., AQUA-CHEM INC., BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
