Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Margaret Tinsley, et al v. Michael Faust, et al
as 19-80146
Not Yet Classified:
JENNIFER KUPISZEWSKI, on behalf of minors: next friend of C.P. next friend of B.T., MARGARET TINSLEY, on behalf of minors: next friend of B.K., MICHAEL FAUST, in official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Child Safety and others
B.K., et al v. Gregory McKay
as 17-17502
Plaintiff - Appellee:
B.K., by her next friend Margaret Tinsley, B.T., by their next friend Jennifer Kupiszewski, A.C.-B., by their next friend Susan Brandt and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY MCKAY, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Child Safety
B.K., et al v. Thomas Betlach
as 17-17501
Plaintiff - Appellee:
B.K., by her next friend Margaret Tinsley, B.T., by their next friend Jennifer Kupiszewski, A.C.-B., by their next friend Susan Brandt and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS J. BETLACH, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System
B.K., et al v. Gregory McKay
as 17-80212
Plaintiff - Respondent:
B.K., by her next friend Margaret Tinsley, B.T., by their next friend Jennifer Kupiszewski, A.C.-B., by their next friend Susan Brandt and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GREGORY MCKAY, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Child Safety
B.K., et al v. Thomas Betlach
as 17-80211
Plaintiff - Respondent:
B.K., by her next friend Margaret Tinsley, B.T., by their next friend Jennifer Kupiszewski, A.C.-B., by their next friend Susan Brandt and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
THOMAS J. BETLACH, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System
Tinsley et al v. Flanagan et al
as 2:2015cv00185
Defendant:
William Humble and Gregory McKay
Plaintiff:
Margaret Tinsley , Jennifer Kupiszewski and Susan Brandt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
