Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RIOS et al v. GUPTA
as 2:2021cv20489
Plaintiff:
MARIA YANES RIOS and MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
GAURAV GUPTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIOS et al v. GUPTA et al
as 3:2021cv20489
Plaintiff:
MARIA YANES RIOS and MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
GAURAV GUPTA and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAMIREZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv18696
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv17873
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00489
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. F/K/A LUZENAC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANA MARIA RAMIREZ
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'DONNELL et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03731
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA OLAGUE , RACHEAL OLDMAN , ELSA OLIVERA and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen Farmer v. Brian Riordan, et al
as 15-2569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN J. FARMER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN RIORDAN, PRISONER HEALTH SERVICES, SHARON REAGAN and others
RAMIREZ et al v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2009cv62574
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO RAMIREZ and MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
AC&S INC, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
