Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dorce v. City of New York
as 20-1809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cecilia Jones, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sherlivia Thomas-Murchison, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and McConnell Dorce, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Neighborhood Restore Housing Development Fund Co. Inc., John Doe 1 to 10, Jane Doe 1 to 10 and others
Dorce et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv02216
Plaintiff:
Sherlivia Thomas-Murchinson, Cecilia Jones and McConnell Dorce
Defendant:
City of New York, Maria Torres-Springer, BSDC Kings Covenant Housing Development Fund Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development et al
as 1:2019cv00354
Defendant:
Maria Torres-Springer and New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development
Plaintiff:
B. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Jones v. Chandler et al
as 1:2018cv06295
Defendant:
Laurie Laprimo, Andrea Foley-Murphy, Maria Torres-Springer and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hannan v. Torres-Springer et al
as 1:2018cv09878
Defendant:
Ray "Doe", Steven Roth, Yamile Zarzuela and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hannan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rodriguez et al v. Torres-Springer et al
as 1:2017cv04344
Defendant:
Maria Torres-Springer, Ben Carson, United States Department of Housing & Urban Development and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Rodriguez and Elaine Pinnock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
