Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Klein v. Jackson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv04445
Defendant: Jerome D. Gramaglia, Robert L. Metzger, WageWorks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Melvyn Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fernandez v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv06409
Plaintiff: Nelly F. Fernandez
Defendant: Franklin Resources, Inc., Franklin Templeton 401(k) Retirement Plan Investment Committee, Norman Frisbie and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cryer v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv04265
Defendant: Franklin Resources, Inc and Franklin Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cryer and Marlon H. Cryer
Consolidated Plaintiff: Nelly F. Fernandez
Consolidated Defendant: Franklin Templeton 401(k) Retirement Plan Investment Committee, Norman Frisbie, Jennifer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Northstar Financial Advisors, v. Schwab Investments, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17187
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORTHSTAR FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: SCHWAB INVESTMENTS, MARIANN BYERWALTER, DONALD F. DORWARD and others
Bohl et al v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv02984
Plaintiff: R. Daniel Bohl, R. Daniel Bohl, Garfield Peate and others
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation, The Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and others
Miscellaneou: YieldPlus Investor Group
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Levin et al v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv02487
Plaintiff: Robert Levin, Robert Levin, Karl Kyzer and others
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Vinayak R. Pai Defined Benefits Pension Plan v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv02058
Plaintiff: Vinayak R. Pai Defined Benefits Pension Plan
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv02046
Plaintiff: The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union and others
Defendant: L. Stephen Smith, W. Roger Haughton, David H. Katkov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities & Exchange Commission Act
Bohl v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv10593
Plaintiff: R. Daniel Bohl and R. Daniel Bohl
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Schwab Investments and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01510
Plaintiff: Mike Labins, James Coffin, David Mikelonis and others
Defendant: The Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. and others
Respondent: TD Ameritrade, Inc.
Petitioner: Karen Cunningham, Mark Kale, Monte Lewis and others
Interested Party: Robert Levin, Karl Kyzer and Barclays Capital Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Investment Company Institute and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Not Classified By Court: Opt Out Parties, PrimeVest Financial Services Inc., Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?