Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Chapman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Marion M. Chapman
Defendant:
Clay Stanton, G. Fife, Brittany Tischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Stanton
as 4:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Marion M Chapman
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Marion Marcellus Chapman
Defendant:
Clay Stanton, Jalilah Otto and Theresa Crayon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Chapman v. Stanton
as 2:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Marion M. Chapman
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colon et al v. Millennia Housing Management, Ltd
as 4:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Maya Colon, Candice Foxworthy, Demario Mack and others
Defendant:
Millennia Housing Management and BVA Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Chapman v. Redington
as 4:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
Marion M Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Redington
as 2:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Marion M. Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Redington
as 4:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Marion M Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
