Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mark Rogers v. G. Vaughn, et al
as 15-20712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJOR G. VAUGHN, CAPTAIN B. NORMAN, CAPTAIN C. WAKEFIELD and others
Rogers v. Vaughn et al
as 4:2015cv02554
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
G Vaughn, B Norman and C Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, R Gardner, P Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Rogers v. Robert Stevens, et al
as 14-10975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT STEVENS, Senior Warden, RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and JOHN T. MONTFORD
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 5:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Respondent:
Robert Stevens, Rick Thaler and John T Montford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stevens et al
as 6:2013cv00913
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, Rick Thaler and John T Montford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Rogers v. J. Baker, et al
as 13-10338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BAKER, Senior Warden, RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and MONTFORD UNIT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Rogers v. Baker et al
as 5:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
J Baker, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Montford Unit Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
