Cases 61 - 70 of 281
Matwyuk v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2022cv08082
Plaintiff:
Philip S Matwyuk
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mark Brnovich, Kingman Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Osborne v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00744
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott Osborne
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eric Wright v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-15654
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, MORMEN, Unknown; Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Harvey v. Adel et al
as 2:2022cv00727
Petitioner:
Joshua Miles Harvey
Respondent:
Allister Adel, Mark Brnovich, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chene Manley v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15573
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHENE DEVONNE MANLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Najib Alghaithi v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15538
Petitioner / Appellant:
NAJIB M. ALGHAITHI
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Wauneka #082558 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Delbert Wauneka
Defendant:
David Shinn, Doug Ducey, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartels #336354 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00563
Petitioner:
Caleb Bartels
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris #113830 v. Shinn, et al.
as 2:2022cv00567
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
David C Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
William Michael Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
