Cases 31 - 40 of 570
WILLIAMS v. ROBBINS et al
as 3:2022cv04903
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALESHIA ROBBINS, SHEILA MELVIN, K M KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. USA
as 22-40184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bonnie Burnette Erwin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Michael Horowitz, Jeff Baney and others
Butler v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv60595
Plaintiff:
Cori Butler
Defendant:
Sec. Mark Inch, Attorney General of the State of Flordia and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginald v. Inch et al
as 8:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Walter Reginald
Defendant:
Mark Inch and Ricky Dirion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2022cv03145
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, C MAIORANA, A MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
David Lee Moore
Respondent:
Mark Inch, Lane, John Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Cruz et al
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hardin
Defendant:
Dr. Cruz, Ricky Dixon, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Inch, et al.
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
Lemuel L. Cole
Respondent:
Mark Inch and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
COOPER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL LEANDER COOPER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J K BUTLER, M SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
