Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Bloechl-Karlsen, Kiersten et al v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2014cv00627
Plaintiff:
Kiersten Bloechl-Karlsen , Angela Bloechl-Karlsen , Stacie Christian and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker, J.B. Van Hollen, Richard G. Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Authors Guild, Inc. v. Hathitrust
as 12-4547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Authors Guild, Inc., Australian Society Of Authors Limited, Australian Society Of Authors Limited and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Hathitrust, Regents Of The University Of Michigan, Regents of the University of California and others
The Authors Guild, Inc. et al v. Hathitrust et al
as 1:2011cv06351
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Inc. , The Australian Society Of Authors Limited , Union Des Ecrivaines Et Des Ecrivains Quebecois and others
Defendant:
Hathitrust, The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, The Regents of the University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow - Madison et al v. The Regents of the University of Wisconsin System et al
as 3:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow - Madison, Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow - Madison, Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow - Madison and others
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, CHARLES PRUITT, JEFFREY BARTELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Badger Catholic, Inc., et al v. David Walsh, et al
as 09-1112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BADGER CATHOLIC, INCORPORATED, ELIZABETH A. CZARNECKI and ELIZABETH A. PLANTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID G. WALSH, MARK J. BRADLEY, JEFFREY BARTELL and others
Badger Catholic, Inc., et al v. David Walsh, et al
as 09-1102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BADGER CATHOLIC, INCORPORATED, ELIZABETH A. PLANTON and ELIZABETH A. CZARNECKI
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID G. WALSH, MARK J. BRADLEY, JEFFREY BARTELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
