Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MPawinayo v. Funk et al
as 3:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Leopold MPawinayo
Defendant:
Glenn R. Funk and Mark J. Fishburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rembert v. Fishburn et al
as 3:2015cv00949
Plaintiff:
MacArthur Rembert
Defendant:
Mark J. Fishburn, Jan Norman, Courtney A. Teasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouse v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Rouse, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Burton Mixer, State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013mc00043
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Rouse, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Burton Mixer, State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole and others
Bumpas v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Bumpas
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute, Mark J. Fishburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv01011
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
Daron Hall , Victor S. (Torry) Johnson, III and Mark J. Fishburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams and Robyn Kelley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Williams v. Hall et al
as 3:2012mc00067
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
Daron Hall , Victor S. (Torry) Johnson, III and Mark J. Fishburn
Irwin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00405
Petitioner:
James Irwin
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Mark Kovach, Mark J. Fishburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
