Cases 11 - 20 of 123
THOMAS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00016
Defendant:
MELLANDER, DAVIS, CHARLES FAENZA and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STAFFORD v. CARTER et al
as 1:2018cv03365
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, MARK LEVENHAGEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2018cv00752
Defendant:
Ms Smith, John Salyer, Ms Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CISLO v. CARTER, JR. et al
as 1:2018cv02533
Defendant:
CRAIG CRAIGE, MICHAEL OSBORN, DUSHANE ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE B. CISLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Harmon-Nary et al
as 3:2018cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jerome Derrell Robertson
Defendant:
Dr Harmon-Nary, Ms Williams and Mark Levenhagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. HARMON-NARY ET AL
as 1:2018cv01614
Defendant:
DR HARMON-NARY, MARK LEVENHAGEN and MS WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JEROME DERRELL ROBERTSON
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only) and WESTVILLE E-FILE(COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Harmon-Nary et al
as 3:2018cv00383
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Jerome Derrell Robertson
Defendant:
Dr Harmon-Nary, Ms Williams and Mark Levenhagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAUL v. BERDINE et al
as 1:2016cv02885
Defendant:
BERDINE and MARK LEVENHAGEN
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. MAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maul v. Berdine
as 3:2016cv00700
Plaintiff:
Richard E Maul
Defendant:
Ms Dr Berdine and Mark Levenhagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorman v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
Andre L Gorman
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Mark Levenhagen, David Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
