Cases 31 - 40 of 298
SCHROCK v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC et al
as 1:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALAN SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANLEY v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02327
Petitioner:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT III v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02297
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BERNARD CROCKETT III
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FELTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02133
Plaintiff:
ISAAC FELTON
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, MARK SEVIER and JENNIFER FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL SR COBB
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUTH v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01906
Petitioner:
BENNIE LEE TRUTH
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAMBERS v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01774
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. CHAMBERS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYD v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01764
Petitioner:
JAMES D. BOYD
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. GEO GROUP, INC et al
as 1:2022cv01728
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MOORE
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC, MARK SEVIER, G. CECIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Mark Sevier, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
