Cases 11 - 20 of 299
BOWENS v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv01453
Petitioner:
COREY BOWENS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TURNER v. REGAL et al
as 1:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
SPENCER TURNER
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, MARK SEVIER, J. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, JENNIFER SMITH, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01442
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ALLEN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC, MARK SEVIER, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENNINGS v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv01292
Petitioner:
LEON JENNINGS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WRIGHT v. DUNN et al
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
DUNN, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGLE, GEO GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROCKETT III v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01075
Petitioner:
WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLEY v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv00670
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLEY
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WINTERS BEY v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WINTERS BEY
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, FITCH, FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
