Cases 1 - 10 of 1,304
Fred Gonzales v. Rashida Jones, et al
as 24-7049
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Rashida Jones, Owner and CEO of MSNBC, Mark Thompson, Owner and CEO of CNN, Suzanne Scott, CEO of Fox and Friends News Network and others
Mark Carter v. BOP
as 24-5082
Plaintiff:
Mark Carter
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office
RIGSBY v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
MARK JEFFERSON RIGSBY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY v. VIPER AIR, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
VIPER AIR, INC., TRION, INC., JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, CHARLES F. SAMS, III, MARK FOUST and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. DALY et al
as 1:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant:
MARK DALY and JACK MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MARKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
CHAD MARKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODRUFF v. HOLBROOK et al
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN L. WOODRUFF
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, BRYAN POTTER and MARK C. COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
