Cases 1 - 10 of 2,377
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Mark D. Terrell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bailey v. Albright
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. David George Hilburn et al
as 4:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
Denver Kyle Moore
Defendant:
David George Hilburn, Anjelica Harris, E. R. Turnbull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bello v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Respondent:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bello v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Defendant:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Joey Ashton, Trey Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Comal County et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Eric Nicholas Gonzales
Defendant:
Comal County, Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Joshua Swillinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
