Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Taccino et al v. West Virginia University Ruby Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2012cv02879
Plaintiff:
Marlene M. Taccino and William A. Taccino
Defendant:
West Virginia University Ruby Memorial Hospital, Western Maryland Health System, Maryland Physician's Care and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taccino et al v. U.S. Bank National Assoc. et al
as 3:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Assoc., Lisa Payne, Wendy Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Taccino v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP
as 10-2346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO and MARLENE M. TACCINO
Defendant - Appellee:
LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP, LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LARRY D. RICHMAN, CEO and others
William Taccino v. HomEq Servicing
as 10-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO and MARLENE M. TACCINO
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMEQ SERVICING, MANCINI & ASSOCIATES, U.S. BANK N/A and others
Taccino et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.L.P. et al
as 1:2009cv02994
Plaintiff:
William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing, L.L.P., LaSalle Bank National Assoc., Larry D. Richman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
William Taccino v. Litton Loan Servicing
as 08-1997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO and MARLENE M. TACCINO
Defendant - Appellee:
LITTON LOAN SERVICING, DENISE BAILEY, Assistant Secretary, Litton Loan for Note Holder LaSalle National Bank Association, ALVIN FRIEDMAN, Atty/Trst and others
Defendant - None:
MICHAEL SCOTT COHEN and JAMES C. EBERLY, JR.
Taccino et al v. Litton Loan SVC. L.P. et al
as 1:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Williams A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino
Defendant:
Litton Loan SVC. L.P., Denise Bailey, Alvin Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
