Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00478
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blocker v. Graham
as 6:2017cv06648
Petitioner:
Marlo J. Blocker
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delano v. Marlo Marketing Communications, Incorporated
as 1:2017cv06721
Plaintiff:
James Whitlow Delano
Defendant:
Marlo Marketing Communications, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Levy v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00584
Plaintiff:
Marlo Yvette Levy
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Grevelding et al
as 5:2017cv00612
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nicholas J. Grevelding, Marlo J. Grevelding and Syracuse Home Association
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03764
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04718
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blocker v. Southport Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2012cv06211
Plaintiff:
Marlo Blocker
Defendant:
Southport Correctional Facility, Correctional Officer Peter Mastrantonio, Individually and in his Official Capacity and Correctioanl Officer Robert Murphy, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.