Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jeremy Pinson, et al v. IRS, et al
as 17-5047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeremy Pinson, Marquis Hicks and Jonathan Jones
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Timothy Lynn Beckwith
Defendant - Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice and others
PINSON et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2017mc00338
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON, MARQUIS HICKS, TIMOTHY LYNN BECKWITH and others
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
HICKS et al v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00416
Defendant:
BETTS, CARMICHAEL, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PINSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00401
Defendant:
BETTS, CARMICHAEL, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS HICKS, JONATHAN JONES and JEREMY PINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00398
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00381
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00385
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00384
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00388
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00389
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
