Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Dennis Bond, Sr. v. Marriott International, Incorp
as 15-1199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DENNIS WALTER BOND, SR. and MICHAEL P. STEIGMAN
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. ENGLAND, LEWIS F. FOSTER and DOUGLAS W. CRAIG, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. STOCK AND CASH INCENTIVE PLAN
Dennis Bond, Sr. v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 15-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS WALTER BOND, SR. and MICHAEL P. STEIGMAN
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. ENGLAND, LEWIS F. FOSTER and DOUGLAS W. CRAIG, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. STOCK AND CASH INCENTIVE PLAN
deMoraes v. Marriott International Inc et al
as 4:2013cv02699
Plaintiff:
Steven deMoraes
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc , Aetna Life Insurance Company and Marriott International Inc Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dessasure v. Marriott International Inc et al
as 9:2011cv03285
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Dessasure
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc , Disability Management Services Inc and Marriott Benefits Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bond, et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv01256
Plaintiff:
Robert J. England , Dennis Walter Bond, Sr. , Lewis F. Foster and others
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc. Stock and Cash Incentive Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
England v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 8:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Robert J. England, Robert J. England, Robert J. England and others
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., ., Marriott International, Inc., ., Marriott International, Inc., . and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
