Cases 31 - 40 of 337
Issouf Coubaly, et al v. Cargill Incorporated, et al
as 22-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Issouf Coubaly, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Sidiki Bamba, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Tenimba Djamoutene, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Cargill Incorporated, Nestle USA Inc., Cargill Cocoa and others
Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 5:2020cv00335
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, dba, Starbucks #6849, The Quaker Oats Company, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Petitioner:
Mars, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Thames v. Mars, Inc.
as 3:2022cv04145
Plaintiff:
Jenile Thames
Defendant:
Mars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv02949
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. and Costa Del Mar, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Kitchenware Enterprise Store, LK Industry Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. and Costa Del Mar, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, BOMEISI US, Cavir-CA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. and Costa Del Mar, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", lanyanfashion Store, lanyan6 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Troy Smith, et al v. Mitchell Miorelli, et al
as 22-10663
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party:
MITCHELL GEORGE MIORELLI, AUSTIN VALLS and JOHN W. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
Troy Smith, et al v. John Davis, et al
as 22-10667
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party:
JOHN W. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
Troy Smith, et al v. Austin Valls, et al
as 22-10666
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party:
AUSTIN VALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
