Cases 51 - 60 of 185
Porter v. Fisher et al
as 3:2016cv00889
Plaintiff:
Keith La-Dale Porter
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Steven Pickett, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Evans v. Marshall Fisher
as 16-60758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL FISHER
Forside v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2016cv00224
Petitioner:
James Lester Forside
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Marshall Fisher and Christy Gutherz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans v. Lenard et al
as 3:2016cv00878
Plaintiff:
Curtis Chrishaun Evans
Defendant:
Joey Lenard, Richard Pennington and Marshall Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weathington v. Bivens et al
as 1:2016cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jerome Weathington
Defendant:
Jarita Bivens, Jacqueline Banks, Lowonda Marsha Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00199
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Pruitt
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Touchstone et al
as 3:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
Bennie Ward
Defendant:
William C. Touchstone, Unknown Baity, Gary Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Bryant et al
as 1:2016cv00388
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Marshall Fisher, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfred Forkner v. Marshall Fisher, et al
as 16-60691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINFRED FORKNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL FISHER, sued individually and in their official capacities, RAYMOND T. BYRD, sued individually and in their official capacities, MARSHALL TURNER, sued individually and in their official capacities and others
Rodgers v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
James John Rodgers
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher and Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
