Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Dudley v. U.S. Marshal Director
as 4:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Gene E Dudley
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dulany v. City of Pineville, MO et al
as 3:2023cv05035
Plaintiff:
JESSICA R DULANY
Defendant:
CITY OF PINEVILLE, MO, GREGG SWEETEN, JEFFREY SCOTT DENNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hayes v. Marshall Police Department
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Fred Hayes
Defendant:
Marshall Police Department, Nicolas Perez, Michael Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Goodwin et al
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones, II
Defendant:
Taylor Goodwin, Richard Townsend, Aaron Waibel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lagani v. Hannibal, Missouri, City of et al
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Richard Marshall Lagani, II
Defendant:
Hannibal, Missouri, City of and City of Hannibal Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Bibbs v. Jackson et al
as 4:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Bibbs
Defendant:
Marilyn Jackson and Fredrick O Marshall d/b/a Community Building Group, Building Management Company, and Sunlight Investors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roettgen v. O'Bryan et al
as 4:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Carl Roettgen
Defendant:
Josh O'Bryan , Tyler Newell , Mike Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
