Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McDowell v. Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
as 4:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
John Harvey McDowell
Defendant:
Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haynes v. Stewart et al
as 8:2019cv00015
Defendant:
John Guilian, Mike Stewart, Oneil Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Haynes, III.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Applegarth, et al v. Marshall, et al
as 4:2016cv03037
Defendant:
American Legion Post 12, Defendants 1X through 5X and Darrell Marshall
Plaintiff:
Joseph Applegarth and Rudy Butch Stanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harrington et al v. City of Hastings et al
as 4:2015cv03152
Defendant:
John Adams, All Other Employees of the City of Hastings, Josh Armon and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Harrington, Meltech, Inc. and Midwest Girls Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
English v. FBI et al
as 8:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kennisha English
Defendant:
FBI and US Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marshall v. Winterer et al
as 4:2013cv03089
Defendant:
Jason C. Demman, State of Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services and Kerry T. Winterer
Plaintiff:
Melanie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Money v. United States Marshalls et al
as 8:2012cv00396
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, John Does and United States Marshalls
Plaintiff:
Kayla Money
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tyler v. Luis et al
as 8:2011cv00433
Defendant:
Luis, Mayo and U.S. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tyler v. Strom et al
as 4:2011cv03082
Defendant:
John Doe, lyle E. Strom and United States Marshalls
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Lux
as 4:2009cv03083
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Moore
Defendant:
Marshall Lux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
