Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Swint v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 2:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
United States Supreme Court, United States Marshals Service and Constitution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Benshoof v. Admon et al
as 2:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof and Kurt Benshoof
Defendant:
Moshe Admon, Daniel Auderer, Justin Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oyetuga v. Washington State Employment Security Department et al
as 3:2019cv06078
Defendant:
Mark Borgaard, Michelle McMillin, John 1-5 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ariyo Ajibade Oyetuga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lister v. COS et al
as 2:2017cv01298
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lister
Defendant:
COS, Prosecutors, Marshal(s) TBA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Worley v. City of Vancouver et al
as 3:2016cv05572
Plaintiff:
Mack E Worley
Defendant:
City of Vancouver , Troy Rawlins , Monica Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarsia v. Joint Base Lewis McChord Provost Marshal Office et al
as 3:2015cv05739
Plaintiff:
Christian Jay Tarsia
Defendant:
Joint Base Lewis McChord Provost Marshal Office, Michael A Dearborn, Charles Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
