Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Ketzbeau v. Ivy et al
as 4:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
Jesse I Ketzbeau
Defendant:
Curtis Ivy, Jr., Frances K. Behm, Nancy Abraham and others
Marshall #732012 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall #732012
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10872
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall
Defendant:
Rewerts, John Doe, West and others
Kuhl v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alexander Kuhl
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark #222915 v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
C. Wilson, R. Niemi, T. Perttu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall #257413 v. Groff et al
as 1:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
Dustin Marshall #257413
Defendant:
Suzanne Groff, Unknown Party #1 and Unknown Party #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. USA
as 1:2023cv12488
Petitioner:
Rodney Oneal Marshall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flowers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv12387
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simpson #495893 v. Santimaw et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Antoine Jamar Simpson #495893
Defendant:
Unknown Santimaw, A. Marshall and D. Curley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers #13667-040 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers #13667-040
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
