Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Rayburn v. Potter et al
as 8:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Clifford R. Rayburn
Defendant:
Danny Potter, United States Marshals, et al, Omaha Police Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mose v. US Marshall
as 8:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Trae Mose
Respondent:
US Marshall
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correction Services et al
as 8:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Dayna, Brandi and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Sarpy County, NE et al
as 4:2020cv03030
Defendant:
US Marshals and Sarpy County, NE
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Z. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 4:2019cv03096
Defendant:
Reese Mckinney, D.T. Marshall and County of Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. US Government et al
as 8:2019cv00310
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Judge Wadie Thomas, US Government and others
Petitioner:
Clifford Wright, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Iverson et al
as 8:2019cv00298
Defendant:
Koreen Mullen, Marshall Lux, City of Wilber and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sailors v. U.S. Marshals Services et al
as 8:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Will Iverson and U.S. Marshals Services
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Sailors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wistrom v. US Marshalls
as 8:2018cv00337
Respondent:
US Marshalls
Petitioner:
Jacob Raymond Wistrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sailors v. US Marshals Service Dept. et al
as 8:2018cv00189
Defendant:
Maxwell Hubka, Cole Jennings, Paul Keyes and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Sailors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
