Cases 41 - 50 of 226
Kilpatric v. People of the State Colorado, The et al
as 1:2021cv02337
Petitioner:
Marshall Kilpatric
Respondent:
No Named Respondent, People of the State Colorado, The and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scarver v. Williams
as 1:2021cv02149
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Scarver
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Anthony A. DeCesaro, Marshall Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Dix et al
as 1:2021cv01971
Plaintiff:
Raymond Marshall
Defendant:
Linda Dix, City of Colorado Springs, City of Colorado Springs City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirchner v. Marshall et al
as 1:2021cv01809
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Jill Marshall
Petitioner:
Jesse Dillon Kirchner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254
Montanez v. Caley et al
as 1:2021cv01714
Petitioner:
Sixto Montanez
Defendant:
Eddie Caley, Kristy Stansell, A. Dugger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Health Service Administrators et al
as 1:2021cv01374
Defendant:
USP Lee, USP Coleman I, USP Atwater and others
Plaintiff:
Deric Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaves v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv01269
Defendant:
Marshall Griffith, Gypsy Kelso, Jerry Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. United States Marshals
as 1:2021cv01249
Petitioner:
William Wilson
Respondent:
United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Yakas et al v. Roark et al
as 1:2021cv01210
Defendant:
Alison Morgan, CoreCivic, Inc., Joel Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pritchard and Joshua Yakas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
