Cases 81 - 90 of 98
M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Fox et al
as 2:2008cv02476
Plaintiff:
M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank
Defendant:
Todd Fox and Jody Fox
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bean v. Norman et al
as 2:2008cv02422
Plaintiff:
James E. Bean and James E. Bean
Defendant:
Steven Norman, Kent Soucy and Keith Marshall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Banks v. Richardson et al
as 5:2008cv03226
Petitioner:
Michael A Banks
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson, Correctional Corporation of America and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hawkes v. United States Marshals
as 5:2008cv03197
Petitioner:
John LeRoy Hawkes
Respondent:
United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 5:2008cv03195
Petitioner:
Nicholas Warner Jones
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Campbell-Marshall v. JC Penny Company, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02320
Plaintiff:
Sharon R. Campbell-Marshall
Defendant:
JC Penny Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Burnett Automotive, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv01031
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Marshall and Gary Michael Marshall
Defendant:
Burnett Automotive, Inc., Burnett Automotive, Inc., Burnett Automotive, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gordon v. TJX Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv02530
Plaintiff:
Tania Gordon, Tania Gordon and Tania Gordon
Defendant:
TJX Companies, Inc., TJX Companies, Inc., Marshalls of MA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multi-District Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
