Cases 11 - 20 of 29
MARSHALL v. USA
as 2:2016cv00295
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANDREW H MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BELSKIS v. STATE OF MAINE BOARD OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN BELSKIS
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE BOARD OF CORRECTION, SOMERSET COUNTY, MAINE MED PRO ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURT v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2014cv00518
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTLAND NEWS CLUB LLC v. DIG PORTLAND LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00510
Plaintiff:
PORTLAND NEWS CLUB LLC
Defendant:
DIG PORTLAND LLC, DIG PUBLISHING LLC, JOHN MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
FITZGERALD et al v. CITY OF PORTLAND et al
as 2:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FITZGERALD , MARGUERITE FITZGERALD and LESLIE SNEDDON
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, MICHAEL F BRENNAN, KEVIN J DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Petitioner:
TREZJUAN THOMPSON
Respondent:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOOKER v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00346
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HOOKER
Defendant:
USA and FEDERAL MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMLIN v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R HAMLIN
Defendant:
USA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NOEL C MARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
TURCOTTE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MARSHAL TURCOTTE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WIDI v. JUSTICE, US DEPT OF et al
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
JUSTICE, US DEPT OF, US ATTORNEY EXECUTIVE OFFICE, THOMAS E DELAHANTY, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
