Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marvin Moody v. Director, Virginia DOC
as 16-6401
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Moody v. Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv01581
Petitioner:
Marvin J. Moody
Respondent:
Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marvin J. Moody v. Todd B. Perseghin
as 13-7089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985
Defendant:
CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Atty and CLARENCE N. JENKINS
Marvin Moody v. Director of Department
as 13-6360
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Marvin Moody v. Dr. Pabla
as 13-6058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. PABLA, Former Doctor, CAROLYN WILLIAMS, Medical Supervisor/Administration and WILLIAM RUBY, Doctor/Administrator
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, C. ROBERTSON, Former Medical Director, L. STANFORD, Medical Supervisor/Administrator and others
Marvin Moody v. Alisa William
as 12-7779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
ALISA WILLIAMS, Psychiatrist, MUHAMMAD, Dr.; Doctor, CAROLYN WILLIAMS, Medical Director and others
Marvin Moody v. Todd Perseghin
as 12-6133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985
Defendant:
CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney and CLARENCE N. JENKINS
Moody v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2011cv01230
Plaintiff:
Marvin J. Moody
Defendant:
C. Robertson, Pabla, L. Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Kelley et al
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Marvin J Moody
Defendant:
Caitlin R. Kelley and Todd B Perseghin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
