Cases 1 - 10 of 32
DIAZ v. VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
CARMEN DIAZ
Defendant:
VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF VINELAND, Kenneth Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
FIGUEROA v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2019cv20993
Defendant:
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., ABC ENTITIES 1-5, FORMER POLICE CHIEF PHILIP D. ZACCHE, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff:
FLORENCIO FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. ARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON et al
as 3:2019cv19018
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY PRINCETON, ARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON, MUESUM OF ART FOR PRINCETON UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDY SAUNDERS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PIECZENIK v. MARTIN et al
as 3:2015cv07484
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PIECZENIK
Defendant:
BOB MARTIN, BARBARA BAUS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv06481
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE AND MARY ROE and ROBERT ROE AND MARY DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv06426
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF UNION, UNION COUNTY CRIMINAL DIV. MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
