Cases
Bey v. Caddo Parish et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv04245
Plaintiff: Uriah El Bey and Mary Ruth Smith
Defendant: Juvenile Court Caddo Parish, Department of Children & Family Court, Gingerbread House & et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HATHORNE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2007cv73938
Plaintiff: CLINTON DANIEL HATHORNE, MARY RUTH SMITH HATHORNE, MYRA NELL HATHORNE POUNDS and others
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64516
Plaintiff: RICHARD DANA SMITH and MARY RUTH SMITH
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
Cross Defendant: FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION, GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Smith et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00108
Plaintiff: Richard Dana Smith and Mary Ruth Smith
Defendant: Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: A. W. Chesterton Company and Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc.
Cross Defendant: Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?