Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Hill v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 1:2020cv03609
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hornberger v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 8:2020cv00786
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission and Maryland Division Of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Hornberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01359
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young-Bey v. Young et al
as 1:2017cv03585
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M Young-Bey
Defendant:
Jay Young, David Blumberg and Maryland Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2017cv03556
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adam Dawson
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Robinson, Ogbuli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland-El v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 8:2017cv02193
Plaintiff:
Archie Holland-El
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission, David Blumberg, Christopher Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Miles v. Harry Hughe
as 17-6979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY HUGHES, Governor of the State of Maryland, in his official capacity, MARK A. LEVINE, former Maryland Commissioner of the Division of Correction, in his official capacity, JOSEPH D. EGEBERG, State Jail Programming & Inspection Officer, in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00777
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
