Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Mathis v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Fonda Mathis
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Anthony Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc.
as 21-2368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY GORDON MATHIS
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES, INC. and DARLING INGREDIENTS, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
LJC ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
US v. Daniel Mathis
as 21-4578
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL LAMONT MATHIS, a/k/a Gunna, a/k/a Mooch, a/k/a D-Man
Roland Mathis v. Joel Ziegler
as 20-7478
Defendant / Appellee:
P. A. ELLIS, RDAP MR. CARNELL, DR. EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
P. A. HUTCHISON, OFFICER JAMES, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MATHIS
US v. Terrance Mathis
as 19-7229
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRANCE GERARD MATHIS, a/k/a T-2
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott Marshall v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 19-1437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
KENT MATHY and AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC
Roland Mathis v. Dr. Irene Wasylyk
as 19-6368
Defendant / Appellee:
ARH APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTH CARE HOSPITAL, GARLAND R. WARD, PA-C and DR. IRENE WASYLYK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MATHIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
