Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
MATHIS v. MANZA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00450
Plaintiff: DAVID L. MATHIS
Defendant: JENNIFER MANZA, CAROL STEELE-SMITH, WILLIAM SCHOPPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMICKLE v. YEADON BOROUGH POLICE DEPT. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv07416
Defendant: YEADON BOROUGH POLICE DEPT., JACQUELINE B. MOSLEY, MOLINEUX and others
Plaintiff: MATHIS AVERY MCMICKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. USA
as 1:2010cv00112
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: SHANNON LAMONT MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MATHIS v. RUNSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00001
Plaintiff: SHANNON LAMONT MATHIS
Defendant: RUNSKI, NEIBLING and JAMES VESHECCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. VESHECCO et al
as 1:2008cv00002
Plaintiff: SHANNON LAMONT MATHIS
Defendant: JAMES S. VESHECCO, MARSHALL J PICCININI, DANOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BEARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02164
Plaintiff: RONALD JACKSON
Defendant: JEFFERY A. BEARD, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, J. K. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. WYDNER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02130
Petitioner: STERLING MATHIS
Respondent: JAMES WYDNER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYNN ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF THOMAS CORBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MATHIS, et al v. RYAN, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1990cv03467
Petitioner: THOMAS BRADY MATHIS
Respondent: JOSEPH M. RYAN , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?